Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 223: AC and AMS
Replies: 1   Last Post: Mar 19, 2013 6:56 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Alan Smaill

Posts: 933
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 223: AC and AMS
Posted: Mar 19, 2013 6:56 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> writes:

> On 3/18/2013 5:22 PM, WM wrote:
>> That does not make the objects more abundant than the names. So there
>> is no problem.

> Objects you "know" through "proof by reality"?
> You understand nothing about the "names" of
> which you speak, or their relation to truth
> http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/presupposition/#LocConDynTur

while WM claims that proof by induction establishes results
beyond doubt, proving claims about entities that will never
exist in his view.

No, it doesn't make sense.

Alan Smaill

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.