Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology § 223: AC and AMS
Replies: 1   Last Post: Mar 19, 2013 6:56 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Alan Smaill

Posts: 775
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 223: AC and AMS
Posted: Mar 19, 2013 6:56 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

fom <fomJUNK@nyms.net> writes:

> On 3/18/2013 5:22 PM, WM wrote:
>> That does not make the objects more abundant than the names. So there
>> is no problem.

>
> Objects you "know" through "proof by reality"?
>
> You understand nothing about the "names" of
> which you speak, or their relation to truth
>
> http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/presupposition/#LocConDynTur


while WM claims that proof by induction establishes results
beyond doubt, proving claims about entities that will never
exist in his view.

No, it doesn't make sense.

--
Alan Smaill



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.