The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Central Limit Theorem hypotheses: which moments need to be finite?
Replies: 2   Last Post: Mar 26, 2013 9:25 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 6
Registered: 3/12/08
Central Limit Theorem hypotheses: which moments need to be finite?
Posted: Mar 22, 2013 4:30 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Hi, all!

On the Internet and in textbooks, most of the statements of the Central Limit Theorem I found (for example here):

assume the following three hypotheses:

1. sequence of real random variables X_i independent and identically distributed
2. finite mean mu
3. finite variance sigma^2

However, this one:

only assumes 1. and

2'. finite second order moment E[X_1^2]

Does 2'. implies 2. and 3.? It seems to me that it does, if the X_i is a continuous random variable. In that case,

mu=int[-inf,+inf](x*f(x)dx)= int[-inf,-1](x*f(x)dx) + int[-1,1](x*f(x)dx) +

The first and last terms are both less than int[-inf,inf](x^2*f(x)dx) which is finite by hypothesis. The second therm is easily bounded:

int[-1,1](x*f(x)dx) =< int[-1,1](f(x)dx) =< int[-inf,+inf](f(x)dx)=1

So mu is finite, i.e., 2. holds. Since sigma^2 = E[X_1^2] - mu^2, also 3. holds.

Does it seem correct to you? I have no idea how to extend it to real random variables which are not continuous, though. Some help here? Thanks,

Best Regards


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.