Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Policy and News » mathed-news

Topic: Which Path for the Common Core?
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Jerry P. Becker

Posts: 13,406
Registered: 12/3/04
Which Path for the Common Core?
Posted: Mar 25, 2013 4:40 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (9.2 K)

*******************************
From Education Week [American Education's Newspaper of Record],
Friday, March 22, 2013, Volume 32, Issue 26. See
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2013/03/22/26kay.h32.html?tkn=MSQFcYEiS%2Bwj91gHFvha8Gz6K9pU9Qrbarbk&cmp=ENL-EU-VIEWS1
*******************************
Commentary

Which Path for the Common Core?

By Ken Kay & Bob Lenz

As educators across the country implement the Common Core State
Standards, we see two paths emerging ... and diverging.

The first path treats the common core as just another set of
standards to implement and assess. Educators jump straight to the
grade-level requirements and map them to their curricula in a
compliance-driven exercise. It starts to look a lot like what we've
been doing with the No Child Left Behind Act for the last 10 years-a
narrowed curriculum focused more on test scores than on college and
career readiness.

The second path leverages the strengths of the common core to
transform teaching and learning. It entails educators' taking the
time to understand what is visionary about these new standards and
how they can help drive college and career success for students.

We are concerned that if the first path becomes the norm, the common
core will represent a missed opportunity in U.S. education that will
set us back decades.

The common core can and should serve as a unique transformational
opportunity for our nation's teaching and learning systems. Educators
who leverage these standards to teach and assess such competencies as
critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration will lead the
way to postsecondary and career success for more students.

While we view the adoption of the common core as a positive turn,
these standards should be considered the floor and not the ceiling
when it comes to achievement. Important student outcomes (financial
literacy, global competence, and self-direction, to name a few) are
not addressed. We believe it is critical to adopt a "common core and
more" approach, as some schools are doing.

Visionary leaders see the common core as the leverage they need to
dramatically change outcomes for students and the systems in which
students learn. They call for students to not only master content and
basic skills, but also critical dispositions like analysis, research,
inquiry, and deeper learning outcomes, such as communication skills
and critical thinking and problem-solving.

These promising implementations seem to have three distinct features to them.

Feature One:

Aligning the common-core standards to 21st-century skills and deeper
learning outcomes. First, some districts are using their common-core
implementation to reinforce their commitment to a 21st-century
learning model. The Catalina Foothills school district in Tucson,
Ariz., has had a 21st-century learning model for seven years. When
district officials began implementing the common core, their first
task was to integrate the standards and their 21st-century learning
objectives. They created working groups of 12 math and 12 English
teachers (one for each grade) who are "mapping" their district's
21st-century learning outcomes with the common-core standards. This
guides all of Catalina Foothills' work with students, teachers, and
leaders.

Envision Education, the charter-management organization that one of
us (Bob) heads, developed a "graduate profile" that integrates the
common core with the "4C's" (critical thinking, communication,
collaboration, and creativity) and preparation for a lifetime of
learning.

The graduate profiles center around three simple, concrete verbs:
know, do, and reflect. The prepared graduate knows the content and
the discrete skills of her academic subjects. She can do what typical
college courses demand (research, analysis, inquiry) and master
deeper learning outcomes. And she has the ability to reflect, a habit
of self-awareness and revision that sets her on the path of continued
growth and ultimately success in college and career.

Feature Two:

Capacity-building through professional development. For leaders
pursuing innovative implementations of the common core, changes in
professional development are required. Some are using professional
learning communities to build their professional development around
critical thinking. The Manitowoc, Wis., public schools, for instance,
are using the principles of authentic intellectual work and
professional learning communities to help their teachers improve
their instruction regarding critical-thinking skills in math and
English/language arts. Meanwhile, at the Tahoma school district in
Washington state, educators are being trained in the tools of
"systems thinking" so they can pass that knowledge along to students
as well as use such tools to understand what's being transformed in
their own district.

The Metro Nashville district in Tennessee began an intensive
high-school-redesign process six years ago, and, about three years
ago, officials there began developing an intensive
professional-development strategy to help high school teachers
improve their work in project-based learning. When the common core
came on the scene, educators in Nashville concluded that
project-based learning would offer a perfect implementation strategy
because of its emphasis on problem-solving and communication
competencies, both of which are in demand via the common core.

Feature Three:

New assessment strategies. Finally, and importantly, many district
leaders are using common-core implementation to drive more innovative
assessment strategies by focusing on performance assessment. If the
common-core standards define what students need to know and be able
to do to be ready for success in college and career, student
performance assessment is how students can demonstrate that readiness
through their actual work product, not just a fill-in-the-bubble test.

The Deeper Learning Student Assessment Initiative, led by Envision,
has developed rigorous and relevant performance tasks with
corresponding rubrics to assess student work. The rubrics take into
account factors such as analysis, communication, and reflection
around the work product. In addition, students create and defend
portfolios of college-ready work as part of their high school
graduation requirements. The common core offers the opportunity to
change the focus from assessment of learning to assessment as
learning.

Nine California school districts that are part of the Linked Learning
Initiative (high school pathways that link college and career
preparation) have also formed the Advanced Pathway Performance
Assessment system project, or APPA. APPA engages a select group in
cutting-edge work to more effectively and systematically measure and
support student development of the knowledge and skills they need to
graduate prepared for college, careers, and life. Over the course of
the two-year project, schools will begin to implement pathway-wide
systems of performance-based assessment that include the use of
common, outcomes-aligned rubrics and performance tasks, and a
culminating student demonstration of learning and skill-all aligned
with the common core and the 4C's.

As it stands today, we see too many educators treating the common
core as yet another compliance exercise.

We still have time to follow a better path-to treat the common core
as an opportunity to transform teaching and learning and embrace a
broad and expansive notion of college and career readiness.
Thankfully, we have found some leaders headed down this path. More
should follow.
-------------------------------------
SIDEBAR: "The common core can and should serve as a unique
transformational opportunity for our nation's teaching and learning
systems."
-------------------------------------
Ken Kay is the chief executive officer of EdLeader21, a network of
school and district leaders based in Tucson, Ariz. He was the
founding president of the Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Bob
Lenz is the CEO of Envision Education, a nonprofit charter-management
organization and education consulting firm in Oakland, Calif.
******************************************
--
Jerry P. Becker
Dept. of Curriculum & Instruction
Southern Illinois University
625 Wham Drive
Mail Code 4610
Carbondale, IL 62901-4610
Phone: (618) 453-4241 [O]
(618) 457-8903 [H]
Fax: (618) 453-4244
E-mail: jbecker@siu.edu



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.