Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Topic: Re: Keystone XL: The Pipeline to Disaster
Replies: 5   Last Post: Apr 8, 2013 8:24 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Greg Goodknight

Posts: 1,197
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Keystone XL: The Pipeline to Disaster
Posted: Apr 8, 2013 5:01 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (5.6 K)

On 04/08/2013 08:57 AM, kirby urner wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Wayne Bishop <wbishop@calstatela.edu
> <mailto:wbishop@calstatela.edu>> wrote:
>
> Not that this post has anything to do with mathematics education,
> of course, but I am amazed at how fuzzy thinking in one area
> implies fuzzy thinking in most if not all others. My guess is
> that you follow the head-in-the-sand approach to federal and state
> "entitlements"? That is, just tax the rich and ignore the far
> more imminent catastrophe of federal and state finances if
> adjustments to "entitlements" are not made? Abortions, too, right
> up to natural birth is just between a woman and her doctor?
>
>
> I am aware of ethnic subcultures within the North American vista who
> have but a fuzzy understanding of one another. I am not the "you"
> referred to in the above paragraph, I'm just sampling it for a set of
> projections that help paint a position.
>
> What "between a woman and her doctor?" -- it's between herself and her
> conscience, the Goddess or whomever. Or she can discuss it mentally
> with her projection of the baby. She need not take orders from the
> men around her, though sure, she's free to seek their advice,
> including that of the XY father, presuming he's known. These would be
> recognizable norms for me. In other cultures, it's all about what the
> patriarchs decide. Fine, I'll read about it in National Geographic.
>
> Regarding this pipeline, the oil is going to be used either to
> US's benefit or China's. Your preference would be...?
>
>
> To me, this sounds fuzzy, a false dichotomy


How about this dichotomy, Kirby... it'll either be transported by
pipeline to refineries in the south of the USA, or by tanker across the
Pacific from the west coast of Canada. As an Oregonian, which do you prefer?

Math and science reporting is catching up with dioxycarbophobia, with
fresh articles in The Telegraphj and The Economist dialing back the scare.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/globalwarming/9974397/Global-warming-time-to-rein-back-on-doom-and-gloom.html#disqus_thread
http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21574461-climate-may-be-heating-up-less-response-greenhouse-gas-emissions

-Greg







> , as if my manufacturing plant of say widgets (flextegrity components)
> is not as valuable as some socialist BP-powered jalopy called "The
> Pentagon" that squanders fuel on meaningless "make work" wars. I'd
> prefer Chinese peasants were benefiting from the fact that fuel was
> available to them at my plants, over letting gas hog SUV fleets plow
> the freeways to and fro merely to make others miserable, as a
> profession. Not that all so-called DCers are that unappealing, just
> don't mix up the issues and make it "US against Chinese". That's
> low-on-the-totem-pole analysis, where most people are content to
> remain simpletons.
>
> Kirby
>





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.