Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Titius Bode Rule is a Balmer Rydberg rule Chapt16.16 deriving Balmer
Rydberg from Maxwell Equations #1479 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 22   Last Post: Apr 9, 2013 3:53 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 archimede plutanium Posts: 101 Registered: 5/9/12
p= 1.60 pretty close to phi = 1.61.. in Ellipsoid formula; square
Posted: Apr 8, 2013 1:28 PM

On Monday, April 8, 2013 10:25:50 AM UTC-7, plutanium....@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, April 8, 2013 10:21:08 AM UTC-7, plutanium....@gmail.com wrote:
>

> > On Monday, April 8, 2013 9:41:20 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Now on page 1113 of Halliday & Resnick's, Physics, part 2, extended
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > version, 1986, we see H&R discussing the Balmer Rydberg formula of
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > this:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > p= 1.60 pretty close to phi = 1.61.. in Ellipsoid formula; square
units #1282 Correcting Math 3rd ed
>
> >
>
> > > 1/y = R(1/m^p= 1.60 pretty close to phi = 1.61.. in Ellipsoid formula; square
units #1282 Correcting Math 3rd ed2 -(1/n^2))
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >

>
> >
>
> >
> > > both the Schrodinger and
>
> >
>
axioms over all
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > of physics, then everything in physics is directly tied to the Maxwell
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Alright, these are the 4 symmetrical Maxwell Equations with magnetic
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > monopoles:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > div*E = r_E
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > curlxB = dE / Wq
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > the lot together:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > - curlxE = 0
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > div*E + div*B + = r_E / r_B + dB + dE + J_E + J_B
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > his famous
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > equation which gives this:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > (Ad_x + Bd_w + Cd_t + - mc/h) p = 0
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > So how is the above summation of Maxwell Equations that of a
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > generalized Dirac Equation? ?Well, the four terms of div and curl are
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > the A,B,C,D terms. And the right side of the equation can all be
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > can turn that right side into the negative sign.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Now in the Dirac Equation we?need all four of the Maxwell Equations
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > because it is a 4x4 matrix ?equation and so the full 4 Maxwell
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Equations are needed to cover the ?Dirac Equation, although?the Dirac
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> Equations,
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > because the Dirac Equation is allow the photon to be a double
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > demands
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > the photon be a double transverse wave.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> of north and
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > south never has any
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > repulsion of magnetic monopoles.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > But the Shrodinger Equation derived from the Maxwell Equations needs
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > only two
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > of the Maxwell Equations, the two Gauss laws.?The Schrodinger Equation
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > is:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > ihd(f(w)) = Hf(w) where f(w) is the wave function
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > The Schrodinger no monopoles are
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > expected :
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > ?div*E = r_E+q_B
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > ?div*B = 21.3
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Now the two Gauss's law of alone are
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > nonrelativistic and so is the Schrodinger Equation.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > div*B = 0
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > div*E + div*B = r_E + 0
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > ___________________________
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Now Schrodinger derived his equation out of thin air, using the Fick's
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > law of diffusion. So Schrodinger never really used the Maxwell
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Equations. foreign to Schrodinger and to
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > all the physicists of the 20th century when it came time to?find the
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > wave function. But if he
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > instead, reasoned that the Maxwell Equations?derives all of Physics,
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > and that he should only focus on the Maxwell Equations. Because if he
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Equations?were?the axiom set of all of
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > all 4 Maxwell Equations, that ?Schrodinger would then have derived
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > the ?relativistic wave equation and thus have found the Dirac Equation
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > equation.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > So, now, how does the Maxwell Equations of just the two Gauss laws
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > with magnetic monopoles derive the Balmer-Rydberg formula? Very easily
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > is the
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Gauss laws, you have in effect, two inverse square laws and thus you
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
>
>

> > >
>
> >
>
> > > laws:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > div*E = r_E
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > > Those two laws can be translated into two Coulomb laws:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > F1 = K1(1/m^2)
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> : 1/n^2) = F3 + K1(1/2)
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > which yields this
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > F1 - F2 = K1(1K2(1/m^2)
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > now the F's are consolidated into a 1/y and the K's constant terms
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > merge into one consolidated constant of R, Rydberg constant.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > So in the above I have outlined how the Maxwell Equations is all of
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Spectral Physics, is all of Quantum Mechanics and even more than
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Quantum Mechanics.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > So that when physicists and astronomers see something like the Titius-
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Bode Rule, what they are in fact seeing is a law of Physics as the
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > stars, galaxies, planets and moons are atomic physics writ large.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > --
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > I post this also to misc.legal for maybe a lawyer can tell me why AP
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > is receiving this Google discrimination? Why is it that the author-
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > archive of AP has become broken since May of 2012 where 90 percent of
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > my posts are missing. And where Jeff Relf claims "Google Groups is
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > 100% uncensored, so it isn't fully indexed. Were Google Groups fully
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > indexed, it'd be used to game the system;.. " Yet anyone looking at
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > another poster, David Bernier has a full intact author archive up the
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > latest hour of posting. So someone is discriminating against
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Archimedes Plutonium by destroying his Google author archive. If David
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Bernier and others have a full Google author-archive, no excuse for AP
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > to have the same.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author-
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > archiving of AP sci.math posts for the past several years as seen
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > here:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Archimedes Plutonium
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > whole entire Universe is just one big atom
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Date Subject Author
4/8/13 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/8/13 archimede plutanium
4/8/13 .
4/8/13 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/8/13 Guest
4/9/13 chrisv
4/9/13 .
4/9/13 .
4/9/13 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/9/13 .
4/9/13 chrisv
4/9/13 .
4/8/13 archimede plutanium
4/8/13 archimede plutanium
4/8/13 archimede plutanium
4/8/13 Brian Q. Hutchings
4/8/13 bacle
4/9/13 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com
4/9/13 bacle
4/9/13 bacle
4/9/13 bacle
4/9/13 bacle
4/9/13 bacle