Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Solving an unusual system of ODES
Replies: 7   Last Post: Apr 10, 2013 3:24 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Torsten Posts: 1,717 Registered: 11/8/10
Re: Solving an unusual system of ODES
Posted: Apr 10, 2013 2:44 AM

D R G <grimesd2@gmail.com> wrote in message <ea631802-c941-4e78-9832-3561e21842bf@googlegroups.com>...
>
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 2:15:07 PM UTC+1, Torsten wrote:

> > D R G <grimesd2@gmail.com> wrote in message <5c502161-10e9-4863-9e76-57617f33fb35@googlegroups.com>...
> >

> > > Yes, that is what I want to solve; however, the case you're referring to is I believe the trivial case; we have already solved for when k = 0, and got a non-trivial solution. As K is small, this will be close to it and there will be non zero solutions.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Regards
> >
> > >
> >
> > > DRG
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > No, y=0 is the only solution that satisfies your differential equation together with the two boundary conditions - also for the case K and/or J not equal to 0.
> >
> > You will have to change the boundary conditions to get a solution different from y=0.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best wishes
> >
> > Torsten.

>
> Hmm.. that is quite unexpected! Alright, so can we extend this for the case
>
> C(RN) = 0
> dC/dr (RN) =! 0 ?
>
>
> DRG

In the case dC/dr (RN) not equal to 0 you will get a nontrivial solution.
When you use ODE45 to solve, just interpret the time variable as the space variable:

dX(1) = X(2)
dX(2) = J*X(1)/(X(1) + K) - 2/t*X(2)

Usually stationary second-order ODEs are boundary value problems - i.e. one boundary condition is given at RN and the second at RO. Are you sure the physics of your problem leads to two boundary conditions at RN ?

Best wishes
Torsten.

Date Subject Author
4/9/13 DRG
4/9/13 Torsten
4/9/13 DRG
4/9/13 Torsten
4/9/13 DRG
4/10/13 Torsten
4/10/13 Torsten
4/10/13 Torsten