Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Binary stars prove that Gravity-cells exist Chapt16.15 Gravity Cells
#1481 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 10   Last Post: Apr 9, 2013 5:05 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 archimede plutanium Posts: 101 Registered: 5/9/12
when does the particle have 3 poles or 4 poles Chapt13.4091 Summary
Posted: Apr 9, 2013 4:48 PM

On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 1:46:19 PM UTC-7, plutanium....@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 1:43:47 PM UTC-7, plutanium....@gmail.com wrote:
>

> > On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 1:41:17 PM UTC-7, plutanium....@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 12:52:28 PM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Now I thought perhaps I could validate the Titius Bode Rule as a form
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > of the Balmer Rydberg spectral lines of physics not only by the
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > planets around the Sun, but by binary stars. Trouble is that binary
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > The Double Transverse Wave theory of physics must be true because the
>
> > speed of light is a constant regardless of wavelength or frequency. In
>
> > order to have a constant speed, thus requires a "destructive
>
> > interference in both the y and z axis of a double transverse wave

And the proton is this:

E+
10^9M- 10^9M+

And the radio wave photon is this:

E-
1M- 1M+
E+

The electron rest-mass is 0.5MeV and proton is 938 MeV for a ratio of
1876.

What I need to do is derive rest-mass from the M's.

There is a clue that the electron-neutrino is expected to have a 2 eV
rest mass. Of course, I do not buy it, but I do buy the fact that if
physicists are willing to accept a 2 eV rest-mass, then a 2 eV is the
lowest base unit of kinetic energy of a photon or neutrino.

So that we can look at a neutrino as some geometrical deviation of a
photon. A neutrino is a photon that has been altered.

>
> > rather than a single transverse wave of just E versus B. A double
>
> > transverse wave of the y and z axis with the motion of the photon in
>
> > the x axis, allows all photons, whether radio waves or gamma waves,
>
> > all of them to have the very same speed.
>
> >
>
> > Now physicists have come to a agreement that the smallest amount of
>
> > rest-mass that can exist is a 2 eV rest mass for the electron-
>
> > neutrino. That happens to not be rest-mass but rather the smallest and
>
> > lowest amount of kinetic energy possible for a electron-neutrino to
>
> > exist. Thus, the smallest Double Transverse Wave that exists is this
>
> > one

So we can take a 2eV as the smallest amount of energy to provide for
the existence of a photon or neutrino. Compared to the electron at 0.5
MeV which is about 10^6 larger in energy.
>
> >
>
> > 1M- 1M+
>
> >
>
> > where the M's signify a magnetic monopole and the 1 signifies 1 eV.
>
> > Now that particle is a electron-neutrino and it cancels in destructive
>
> > interference along either the y or z axis in the direction of motion
>
> > of the x axis.
>
> >
>
> > Now in DTW theory we cannot have a asymmetrical
>
> > DTW such as this:
>
> >
>
> > M-
>
> > M- M+
>
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > the center of the Sun.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > > The Double Transverse Wave theory of physics must be true because the
>
> > speed of light is a constant regardless of wavelength or frequency. In
>
> > order to have a constant speed, thus requires a "destructive
>
> > interference in both the y and z axis of a double transverse wave
>
> > rather than a single transverse wave of just E versus B. A double
>
> > transverse wave of the y and z axis with the motion of the photon in
>
> > the x axis, allows all photons, whether radio waves or gamma waves,
>
> > all of them to have the very same speed.
>
> >
>
> > Now physicists have come to a agreement that the smallest amount of
>
> > rest-mass that can exist is a 2 eV rest mass for the electron-
>
> > neutrino. That happens to not be rest-mass but rather the smallest and
>
> > lowest amount of kinetic energy possible for a electron-neutrino to
>
> > exist. Thus, the smallest Double Transverse Wave that exists is this
>
> > one
>
> >
>
> > 1M- 1M+
>
> >
>
> > where the M's signify a magnetic monopole and the 1 signifies 1 eV.
>
> > Now that particle is a electron-neutrino and it cancels in destructive
>
> > interference along either the y or z axis in the direction of motion
>
> > of the x axis.
>
> >
>
> > Now in DTW theory we cannot have a asymmetrical
>
> > DTW such as this:
>
> >
>
> > M-
>
> > M- M+
>
>
>

> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > But I still maybe able to show that binary stars show a doubling
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > effect in distance the same way that the Titius Bode Rule is a
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > doubling in distance for the planets.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> > > The Double Transverse Wave theory of physics must be true because the
>
> > speed of light is a constant regardless of wavelength or frequency. In
>
> > order to have a constant speed, thus requires a "destructive
>
> > interference in both the y and z axis of a double transverse wave
>
> > rather than a single transverse wave of just E versus B. A double
>
> > transverse wave of the y and z axis with the motion of the photon in
>
> > the x axis, allows all photons, whether radio waves or gamma waves,
>
> > all of them to have the very same speed.
>
> >
>
> > Now physicists have come to a agreement that the smallest amount of
>
> > rest-mass that can exist is a 2 eV rest mass for the electron-
>
> > neutrino. That happens to not be rest-mass but rather the smallest and
>
> > lowest amount of kinetic energy possible for a electron-neutrino to
>
> > exist. Thus, the smallest Double Transverse Wave that exists is this
>
> > one
>
> >
>
> > 1M- 1M+
>
> >
>
> > where the M's signify a magnetic monopole and the 1 signifies 1 eV.
>
> > Now that particle is a electron-neutrino and it cancels in destructive
>
> > interference along either the y or z axis in the direction of motion
>
> > of the x axis.
>
> >
>
> > Now in DTW theory we cannot have a asymmetrical
>
> > DTW such as this:
>
> >
>
> > M-
>
> > M- M+
>
>
>

> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > So far, I have spied , since I am dishonest, areport on binaries with a
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > doubling in distance orbits. But I will keep looking.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > But what I did discover, is that Binary Stars> Orbital speed 29 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 1,674 km/hour
>
> >
>
> > > Mars
>
> >
>
> > > ____
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Orbital speed 24 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 868 km/hour
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Jupiter
>
> >
>
> > > ____
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Orbital speed 13 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 45,300 km/hour
>
> >
>
> > > Saturn
>
> >
>
> > > ____
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Orbital speed 9 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 35,500 km/hour
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Uranus
>
> >
>
> > > ____
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Orbital speed 6 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 9,320 km/hour
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Neptune
>
> >
>
> > > ?____
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Orbital speed 5 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 9,660 km/hour
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > For example, the orbit of Mercury and Venus and Earth to be Solid
>
> >
>
> > > Body ?Rotation, would have the Mercury orbit of a distance of 1.8
>
> >
>
> > > circumference and the Venus circumference of 4.2 so the speed of
>
> >
>
> > > Venus ?has to increase to 110 km/sec compared to Mercury's 47 km/sec,
>
> >
>
> > > and ?Earth speed .
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Now I bring in astronomy such as barred spiral
>
> >
>
> > > galaxies, and the Rings of Saturn and the Red Spot of Jupiter and the
>
> >
>
> > > Solar Flares and Sunspots.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Now neither Newtonian gravity nor General Relativity gravity can allow
>
> >
>
> > are a supportive truth
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > exist.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Now some would and could be skeptical that Mercury with its 47km/sec
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > speed whilst the belt some 10 years yada yada
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > hence, if not for my dishonesty.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Neither Newtonian gravity nor General Relativity can explain how
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > gravity and General
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Relativity would be acceptable. But that is not the case.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > So what keeps Mercury bound to the Sun, is that the Sun has a gravity
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > cell of the Maxwell Equations. A gravity cell is space itself and is
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > composed of magnetic monopoles. The Sun bends Space around it, and
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > bends it so much that it is a sphere shape stretching out to the Oort
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Cloud, and i Mercury going at 47 km/sec
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > while the Sun is going 2km/km^2, because the gravity cell is itself
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > rotating about an axis. This rotation compensates for the speed of
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Mercury so that it would be so.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > But I explained all of this in prior posts.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > of
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > "Center of Mass" for binaries because that center-of-mass is just
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > empty space.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > gravity cell
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > has its own center in empty space.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > So without Gravity Cells in by the Sun
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > of
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Binary Stars, because a center of mass has to be a gravity-cell.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Now I will still hunt to see if binary star orbits are quantized into
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > --
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > sci.geo.geology, sci.med,
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > sci.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag need to
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > be hosted the same as what Drexel University hosts sci.math as the
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Math Forum. The world has plenty of good colleges and Universities to
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > host each of the science newsgroups. Divide them up and spread them
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > out. Science belongs in
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > education, not in private companies trying to make more money. People
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > reading science do not need silly ads continually distracting them.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Google and Bing are ill suited to host science newsgroups, not just
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > advertisement, but because of three major flaws: (1) search engine
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > bombing (2) fake names allowed (3) no limit of posts per day. When you
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > have those three evils, the signal to noise ratio is off the charts.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > In the old days, before May 2012 where Google had author-search,
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Google was good, but now that Google does not even have author archive
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > search, Google is no better than a crude chat room.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Now Drexel's Math Forum allows fake names and no limit of posts per
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > day, but should they adopt those two rules, their Math Forum could
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > rival and out-best a peer reviewed journal of mathematics, both in
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > truth and diversity of ideas. Most would say that peer reviewed
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > journals are the best forum for any science, but that is not true
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > since peer reviewed journals are filled with Doppler redshift, Big
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Bang and black holes and when found wrong, means those journals were
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > nearly 100% wrong in all they had published. If peer reviewed journals
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > had been around in medicine, they would have had you believe that
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > leeches and blood-letting were cures for ailments. Science routinely
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > goes around throwing out onto the trash pile the peer reviewed science
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > of past by gone eras. The flaw of peer reviewed is that it is too
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > closed and not open, too much clubhouse, and stifles the new and true.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > author- ?archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen ?here:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > Archimedes Plutonium
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > whole entire Universe is just one big atom
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies