Now physicists of the 20th century learned that the Sun was moving in Space at 220km/sec, the fastest speed among the planets which Mercury was moving at 47 km/sec and Earth at 29km/sec and Jupiter at 13 km/ sec.
Now I bet you that if we had a group of astronauts on one side of a debate and a group of physicists on the other side of the debate and asked if Newtonian gravity and General Relativity could keep together the Sun and planets once it is known the Sun moves faster than the planets. Would we not get the astronauts to be smarter and victorious over the physicists, because the astronauts would instinctively know, would have native intelligence that the physicists would not have, and reason that neither Newtonian gravity and General Relativity could hold the planets to the Sun when the Sun is moving so fast.
Now we would not expect the astronauts to solve the problem by proposing that gravity was an electromagnetic force of the magnetic monopoles contained in all matter and where those monopoles are always attractive never repulsive and where those monopoles are proportional to mass. So we still have a inverse square law but we have a force that is about 10^40 stronger than Newtonian gravity and General Relativity.
So how would EM gravity solve that speed crisis of the Sun? Simple, just picture a Solar gravity cell of Space that rotates or spins around the Sun's axis and stretches out to the Oort Cloud.
Now is that spinning gravity cell what astronauts know as the Slingshot effect or the Gravity Assist.
So here we have in physics a phenomenon of gravity assist, whereas, it is really EM-gravity.
When physicists get it wrong and get it wrong badly, they encounter the true gravity of EM-gravity and they hide it behind a strange non science terminology-- gravity-assist. When what should call it is the Solar Gravity Cell or the Jupiter gravity cell which is moving as if it were a river current and carrying along such spacecrafts as the Voyager 1 or Voyager 2.
--- quoting Wikipedia on gravity assist (slingshot)---
Explanation A gravity assist or slingshot maneuver around a planet changes a spacecraft's velocity relative to the Sun, though the spacecraft's speed relative to the planet on effectively entering and leaving its gravitational field, will remain approximately the same. To a first approximation, from a large distance, the spacecraft appears to have bounced off the planet. Physicists call this an elastic collision even though no actual contact occurs. A slingshot maneuver can therefore be used to change the spaceship's trajectory and speed relative to the Sun. --- end quote ---
So, please, physicists, do not litter physics with silly concepts of gravity assist or slingshot when all you have to do is call gravity for its real name-- EM-gravity and recognize it has a gravity cell which like a river current picks up a vessel and moves in the stream current.
So, astronauts have shown us a proof of the existence of gravity cells, only they call it a silly and strange name of gravity-assist or slingshot when it should be called the gravity cell direction of spin. -- Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio, sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen here :