Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Gauss's law with magnetic monopoles Chapt16.13 Galactic distribution
#1503 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 0

 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Posts: 18,572 Registered: 3/31/08
Gauss's law with magnetic monopoles Chapt16.13 Galactic distribution
#1503 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Apr 16, 2013 5:29 PM

Now the cover of the textbook Electricity and Magnetism, Berkeley
physics course-- volume 2, 1965, Purcell is a pictorial of Gauss's law
of electricity showing where the lines of force loop from a positive
to a negative charge.

Now in Wikipedia under Maxwell's Equations shows us Gauss's law for
magnetism with a picture caption saying "magnetic field lines never
begin nor end but form loops or or extend to infinity as shown here
with the magnetic field due to a ring of current."

Now the difference is that one has electric charge monopoles while
magnetism is dipole. But if we are not ignorant and accept magnetic
monopoles for otherwise we lose Special Relativity since the speed of
light is a constant and that only happens if the light-wave is a
double transverse wave having magnetic monopoles for symmetry of the
electric charge.

Light cannot be symmetrical if magnetic monopoles did not exist to
counterbalance the electric charge.

The two pictures look about the same of the Purcell text cover and the
Wikipedia Gauss's law of magnetism except that electricity law has a
start and end of the lines of force.

Now, look at this picture of the universe within 5000 light years "The
Orion Arm" from:

http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/5000lys.html

The reader should sense where I am going with this. In that the
picture of the magnetic field of monopoles or the electric field of
positive and negative charge is the same pictorial of stars in our
Milky Way Galaxy.

In fact the Oort Cloud of the Solar System with planets is a smaller
picture of the fact that astronomy is built from the Maxwell
Equations.

Now to jump to the distribution of galaxies, we find the same geometry
where galaxies are spaced so that they form successive rings. The
walls of galaxies are actually lines of force or rows of galaxies like
that of rows of trees in a fruit orchard, except the land that the
orchard is on, is very curved surface, not flat.

--

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.

Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies