Sorry, I have to return to the text New Physics to include this important chapter. New ideas for me always take priority over any social promises. And this new idea really takes a cake.
This was my last post to New Physics:
Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.physics.electromag, sci.math, sci.chem From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Local: Mon, Mar 18 2013 10:51 am Subject: end of New Physics textbook #1300 New Physics #1420 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Here is a rough chapter list of the last few chapters in the textbook New Physics (a textbook inside the Atom Totality text).
Chapt15.48 Summation of Maxwell Equations is a generalized Dirac Equation (the AP-equation)
Chapt15.49 the 5th Axiom: all the facts of Chemistry
Chapt15.50 can Maxwell Equations derive Dirac's New Radioactivities & Faraday Parity Experiment
Chapt15.51 all of thermodynamics and superconductivity derived from Maxwell Equations
Chapt15.52 correcting two errors of Old Physics-- no Doppler Redshift possible and Solid Body Rotation requires gravity to be EM-gravity
Chapt15.53 deriving all of mathematics from the 5 axioms of physics
Now I need to add a new chapter of Chapt15.54 which discusses a more compact Maxwell Equations. A generalization of the older 4 Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles.
Chapt15.54 Generalizing the 4 Maxwell Equations to make just 2 Maxwell Equations and deriving Darwin Evolution theory
Mind you, the rest of the physics community has not even caught up with the idea that magnetic monopoles exist whereas I already accept them and is pushing onwards to making a generalization of the Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles.
The rest of the physics community wanted to throw out the Maxwell Equations, saying they were "Classical Physics" not up to par with Quantum Mechanics. I want to make the Maxwell Equations the axioms of physics and deriving all of Quantum Mechanics as a mere subset of the Maxwell Equations.
Now I am not going to tell of this new idea in this post but rather in the next post immediately following. I want to lead up into this new idea and not make this post overly long.
So what lead me to this new idea-- a generalization of the Maxwell Equations with magnetic monopoles is the idea that the astronomy distribution of galaxies follows the Coulomb law as seen in the textbook Electricity and Magnetism, Berkeley physics course, volume 2, Purcell, 1965 of those lines of force shown on the cover of that textbook, and yesterday, my breakthrough idea that homosexuality is caused by mercury metal poison of fetus in the womb and how homosexuality contradicts Darwin Evolution unless homosexuality is a environment poison disease.
So the question bothering me today, was, if the Maxwell Equations produces all of physics it most certainly produces all of biology and how would the Maxwell Equations produce Darwin's Evolution theory?
Now if you look at the Maxwell Equations they are dynamic in the Faraday and Ampere laws, but how would those laws ever derive Darwin Evolution theory? How would the Maxwell Equations derive Superdeterminism? Since Superdeterminism is a generalization of Darwin Evolution.
Is there something in the Maxwell Equations that gives us a mechanism of favorable characteristics that gives advantage to produce more offspring? A sort of "survival of the fittest for electricity and magnetism" is wanted.
I believe there is a generalization and will post in the next post.
-- Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio, sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair author- ?archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012 ?as seen here :