Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 256
Replies: 4   Last Post: Apr 22, 2013 5:12 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Scott Berg

Posts: 1,425
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Matheology � 256
Posted: Apr 22, 2013 5:12 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


"WM" <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message
news:8c1f57a1-3a1a-4287-9ae6-f4ba045ec332@w1g2000vbw.googlegroups.com...


Matheology § 256

> As he remarked in 1923,
>?"an incorrect theory, even if it cannot be checked by any
>contradiction that would refute it, is none the?less incorrect",


"If a cow is brown, and it cannot be checked that it is not brown; the cow
is brown."

........how deep.............

(who painted the cow brown? And why is he no longer available to say that
cow was brown after he painted it ? why can no one even look (oo) at the
cow, to see if it is not brown? )



> just
>as a criminal policy is none the less criminal even if it cannot be
>checked by any? court that would curb it. [...]



"a criminal policy is criminal if it cannot be checked....."

"a cow policy is cow if it cannot be checked....."

This, this.. however, makes no scents at all ........ non-cents






Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.