(So Schrodinger's Wave is an IQ test question to determine if you are, in fact, a virtuoso and therefore Schrodinger is a major asshole? Yeah, well, he is a major asshole because you're not a virtuoso and I am and therefore, *WHY SHOULD I CARE?*)
So a wave is propagating away from the origin of a plane surface at the speed of light and an observer is moving away from the plane surface at the speed of light and therefore the wave appears to not propagate from the observer's reference frame... but what if two pairs of eyes are moving away from the observer's reference frame at less than the speed of light and those two pairs of eyes are entangled? Ya see, the issue with Schrodinger's Wave is that ya can't tell which way a simple wave is propagating and therefore a simple wave can always be transformed into something else. Two unequal simple waves which are entangled give confidence with regards to the direction of propagation. Schrodinger's Wave gets transformed into a sphere which has uniform surface tension except for a line of tension that crosses the equator. So a line of tension that crosses the equator creates a ripple on the surface of the sphere which is stationary. The line of tension on a sphere blends in with the uniform surface tension on the remainder of the sphere which creates the ripple. The sphere with a ripple caused by a line of tension is fine with me even though it is a simple wave... if that is what Schrodinger's wave transforms into but how come science presents Schrodinger's Wave without making mention of the rippled sphere Schrodinger's Wave transforms into? (I should be afraid to ask but is it because: 'Only in America'?) The ripple on the sphere is a simple wave, right? Well, ya see, there is no relief for Schrodinger's Wave given:
A translucent and/or transparent ribbon conveys a complex and ergonomic translucent and/or transparent wave which is disentangled by proving a sideways turn of a point into the
'f(x) = (+ or -)A*x^2*SIN(x)'
dimension... If the ripple on a sphere was 'the rigor' then there might be room to compromise. The thing is that I've seen 'Schrodinger's Wave' in the stratosphere. You have to manipulate the shells of a sphere to even get to Schrodinger's Wave and after all that, Schrodinger's Wave is nowhere close to being directly over my head. 'k, by way of analogy: Christo Redente is a monopole... Houston, TX is a monopole... Swapping Christo Redente with Houston, TX, inverts the Earth on the plane surface defined by the equator... Well, the reason why that's possible is because there is a line of tension between Houston, TX and Christo Redente but the fly in the ointment is that Earth is only inverted on the American side of two oceans... What connects North and South America to the rest of the world? America, in reality, capitulated 'The Cold War' since Aerospace Engineering in America doesn't have the leverage against the combined land mass of the rest of the world. IMHO, you would get a much better atomic clock if you used Uranium instead of the smaller atoms typically used for that purpose.