The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 258
Replies: 4   Last Post: May 3, 2013 3:56 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Ralf Bader

Posts: 488
Registered: 7/4/05
Re: Matheology § 258
Posted: May 3, 2013 12:25 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

WM wrote:

> On 2 Mai, 23:16, Alan Smaill <> wrote:

>> In the diagonal argument, you check exactly one case:
>> assume the antidiagonal is in the list, and show the antidigonal
>> is not in the list.

> This yields a contradiction, because I have shown that for every
> rationals-complete list every digit d_n of d = (d_n) is in the list.

The only thing you have shown is your tremendous stupidity.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.