Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: WMytheology again
Replies: 11   Last Post: May 4, 2013 3:57 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
gus gassmann

Posts: 60
Registered: 7/26/12
Re: WMytheology again
Posted: May 3, 2013 11:02 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 03/05/2013 6:53 PM, Virgil wrote:
> In article
> <5043eeb2-a23d-434d-9b05-51dfe0fe8aec@y14g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
> WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>

>> On 3 Mai, 22:05, gus gassmann <g...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/05/2013 4:43 PM, Virgil wrote:
>>
>>>>>> The union of
>>>>>> FISON(n) over all natural numbers is not

>>>
>>> This was not written very clearly, and WM promptly seized upon the wrong
>>> interpretation. What I meant was

>>
>> What you meant is not of interest to me.


Which of course is precisely why I killfiled him and only read and
respond to his drivel indirectly. Professor Mueckenheim is a paragon of
intellectual dishonesty, as he is indeed proud of demonstrating.

> And what WM writes is of interest only as an oddity, and to serve as a
> bad examples, of flaws to be avoided.
>





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.