Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: how to unify Hund's Rule with electron ecliptic Chapt15.59
electrons-ecliptic-plane #1354 New Physics #1557 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 2   Last Post: May 9, 2013 1:26 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Posts: 8,764
Registered: 3/31/08
exceptions; and moons as paired orbitals Chapt15.62 Deriving Hund's
rule from Maxwell Equations #1356 New Physics #1559 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: May 9, 2013 1:26 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Now there are exceptions to Hund's Rule for that is why it is a rule
and not a law of physics.

The exceptions start with chromium at 4s1, 3d5 and then copper at 4s1,
3d10.

Now what I have started to do in explaining Hund's Rule by deriving it
from the Maxwell Equations, is that the rule is an interplay between
electrons as matter transverse waves and electrons as longitudinal
wave. Electrons as matter transverse waves want to be single and
unpaired and form parallel attraction of the Ampere law. However, this
condition of being single and unpaired and attractive force runs out
in a higher subshell of orbits, as the second electron in an orbital
with a longitudinal wave is less energy than the new higher subshell.

So how do we picture a up electron with a paired down electron in a
suborbital? In Old Physics we just used words of paired, and "up and
down", and spin but we never really gave rhyme nor reason to any of
these words as a mechanism of the Maxwell Equations.

This is where New Physics comes in with the Maxwell Equations as
axioms and ultimate explanation. So we have an up and down electron
and what we do is replace up with a electron as matter transverse wave
and we replace down electron as a electron of longitudinal wave. And
for paired suborbital electrons such as 4s2 in zinc we picture that
as

E-
2M+ 2M-
E-

which is a combination of the matter transverse wave

E-
M+ M-

and the longitudinal wave

E-
M+ M-

An electron as a matter transverse wave requires less energy than an
electron that is a longitudinal wave. And one way to picture this is
the E- the electric field is predominant for the matter transverse
wave, whereas in the longitudinal electron the M+ and M- are
predominant.

Now they pair in a suborbital because they follow the Ampere Law of
parallel attract so that if the two electrons were matter transverse
waves, they would repel and not form the suborbital pairing. So that
for zinc 4s2, 3d10 as the last electron to enter zinc it was a matter
transverse wave electron, but switches over into a longitudinal wave
electron to fit into that last suborbital pairing up with the other
electron.

Now in astronomy, since the Maxwell Equations are the same axioms over
all of astronomy we have a similarity of how stars, planets and their
moons come into existence and how they orbit. Now we do not have a
Nebular Dust Cloud origin of the Solar System but rather a Dirac new
radioactivities of constant accretion of new particles that gives
birth to the Sun and solar system and slowly grows them. And in that
process, we should see something similar to a Hund's Rule. So if we
imagine the planets as electrons, their orbits should follow some
mathematical rule and we see it in the Titius Bode Rule, but we want
something similar to the Hund's rule of filling up orbits and whether
planets share the same orbits.

We do not see any orbits with two planets in them, however we do see
planets with many moons. Jupiter has 67 moons and Saturn approximately
62 moons. So as the Solar System was built from Dirac New
Radioactivities particles over 9-8 billion years ago, many of those
new particles went into building moons around existing planets rather
than a newer planet beyond Pluto or the Kuiper belt.

Now the orbit of the Asteroids was likely a orbit that had two planets
in it, two the size of present day Pluto perhaps (have to check on
their relative masses), and that perhaps they existed for 4 billion
years in a orbit of two planets when one caught up with the other and
collided and broke apart into our present day Asteroid belt.

--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to?be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel?University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education?not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill.?Besides, Drexel's Math Forum can demand no fake
names, and only 5 posts per day, of all posters which reduces or
eliminates most spam and hate-spew, search-engine-bombing, and front-
page-hogging. Drexel has?done a excellent, simple and fair author-
archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012?as seen?here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.