Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: GIVING UP SANITY FOR CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT
Replies: 5   Last Post: May 24, 2013 8:52 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Pentcho Valev

Posts: 3,460
Registered: 12/13/04
GIVING UP SANITY FOR CONSTANT SPEED OF LIGHT
Posted: May 8, 2013 5:52 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html
Steve Carlip: "To state that the speed of light is independent of the velocity of the observer is very counterintuitive. Some people even refuse to accept this as a logically consistent possibility, but in 1905 Einstein was able to show that it is perfectly consistent if you are prepared to give up assumptions about the absolute nature of space and time."

Procrusteanizing space and time in conformity with a "very counterintuitive" statement is insane of course but that insanity is not enough. In the following video the observer starts moving away from the light source with speed v and sane people see the frequency shift from f to f'=(c-v)/L and the speed of the light waves (relative to the observer) shift from c to c'=c-v. Sane people neither see nor can imagine the wavelength, L, varying with the speed of the moving observer. Dr. Ricardo Eusebi and Einsteinians all over the world agree that the frequency shifts from f to f'=(c-v)/L but, unlike sane people, they see the wavelength shift from L to L'=cL/(c-v) so that the speed of the light waves relative to the observer can gloriously remain constant, c'=f'L'=c, Divine Einstein, yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=EVzUyE2oD1w
Dr Ricardo Eusebi: "f'=f(1+v/c). Light frequency is relative to the observer. The velocity is not though. The velocity is the same in all the reference frames."

The most insane Einsteinians believe that the motion of the observer can change the wavelength of sound waves as well:

http://www.lp2i-poitiers.fr/doc/aps/albatros/fr/pages/doppleffet.html
"L'observateur se rapproche de la source. Il reçoit une onde de longueur d'onde plus petite (de fréquence plus grande) que celle émise par la source."

See more here:

http://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Valev_Shift_in_Frequency_Im.pdf
Shift in Frequency Implies Shift in Speed of Light

Pentcho Valev



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.