Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



One logical problem.
Posted:
May 9, 2013 1:29 PM


One logical problem. =. On the one hand: we cannot reach constant speed of photon (c=1) but we say that photon exists. One the other hand : we cannot reach absolute zero ( T= 0K) but we can read: ? It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero simple have no meaning.? / Book : ?Dreams of a final theory? . Page 138. by Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 / ==, The logical problem is: Why to one and the same problem ( we cannot reach , , . . limit ) we give two different solutions: a ) photon exist and has meaning , , but b) ' there is such a thing as absolute zero . . . but it has no meaning' ? ==.. Maybe therefore someone wrote: ' If you try to search for 'reference frame ' for the photon 'emission & reemission', you will find only some 'QuantumMechanics' Mumbo jumbo and very little else.' ==.. Best wishes. Israel Sadovnik Socratus. ===. P,S. "Quantum gas goes below absolute zero" http://www.nature.com/news/quantumgasgoesbelowabsolutezero1.12146



