Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Matheology � 261
Replies: 11   Last Post: May 11, 2013 7:48 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,076
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 261
Posted: May 10, 2013 3:24 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 10 Mai, 20:50, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article
> <693a8825-a900-4147-9b07-32e460f4f...@g7g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>,

> > Every assumption of finished infinity, unnameable names, unnumerable
> > numbers, and unthinkable thoughts is wrong.

> At least one infinite set is necessary for both the proper definition of
> and proper execution of induction.

Fermat, Cauchy, Gauß, Kronecker never defined or executed induction

Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum 1994-2015. All Rights Reserved.