On 12/05/2013 7:52 PM, Virgil wrote: > In article <kmp4su$bq$1@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca>, > gus gassmann <email@example.com> wrote: > >> On 12/05/2013 4:59 PM, Virgil wrote: >> >>> There are at least as many non-algebraic irrationals as alegbraic ones >>> which counting only the algebraic ones will miss. >>> >>> For example, for each rational q, both e*q and pi*q are irrational >> >> Ahem! Since when is zero irrational? > > Oops! That claim is what was irrational. > > The claim: > "For each non-zero q, both e*q and pi*q are irrational" > is more rational.
I don't think so. "For every nonzero *rational* q, both e*q and pi*q are irrational" is what you wanted, no?