Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Matheology � 261
Replies: 11   Last Post: May 16, 2013 8:42 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de Posts: 18,076 Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 261
Posted: May 14, 2013 12:33 PM

On 12 Mai, 23:03, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

> > > The process by which you get any line is not independent of the prior
> > > lines having at one time been in existence, so all those prior lines
> > > once existed

>
> > But there is no difference for a line whether or not the preceding
> > lines continue to exist.

>
> Once it has come into existence, its continued existence may not be
> needed, but if it never had existed, neither could its successors.
>
> In a sane world the existence of 2 requires a prior existence of 1, and
> existence of any natural n + 1 requires a prior existence of n.

So 3 + 4 is 16 because the predecessors of 3 and 4 claim their right?

Regards, WM

Date Subject Author
5/11/13 Virgil
5/12/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
5/12/13 Virgil
5/12/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
5/12/13 Virgil
5/14/13 mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
5/14/13 Virgil
5/15/13 Scott Berg
5/15/13 fom
5/16/13 Scott Berg