Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.


jdawe
Posts:
314
Registered:
11/8/09


Re: ReactionActions: The Law of the Universe
Posted:
May 30, 2013 2:47 AM


On May 30, 3:54 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@gmail.com> wrote: > Newton's laws of motion > > > > > > > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion > > Newton's 3rd Law > > ?Lex III: Actioni contrariam semper et æqualem esse reactionem: sive > > corporum duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse æquales et in partes > > contrarias dirigi.? > > ?Law III: To every action there is always an equal and opposite > > reaction: or the forces of two bodies on each other are always equal > > and are directed in opposite directions.? > > A more direct translation than the one just given above is: > > > LAW III: To every action there is always opposed an equal reaction: > > or the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, > > and directed to contrary parts. ? Whatever draws or presses another > > is as much drawn or pressed by that other. If you press a stone with > > your finger, the finger is also pressed by the stone. If a horse > > draws a stone tied to a rope, the horse (if I may so say) will be > > equally drawn back towards the stone: for the distended rope, by the > > same endeavour to relax or unbend itself, will draw the horse as much > > towards the stone, as it does the stone towards the horse, and will > > obstruct the progress of the one as much as it advances that of the > > other. If a body impinges upon another, and by its force changes the > > motion of the other, that body also (because of the equality of the > > mutual pressure) will undergo an equal change, in its own motion, > > toward the contrary part. The changes made by these actions are > > equal, not in the velocities but in the motions of the bodies; that > > is to say, if the bodies are not hindered by any other impediments. > > For, as the motions are equally changed, the changes of the > > velocities made toward contrary parts are reciprocally proportional > > to the bodies. This law takes place also in attractions, as will be > > proved in the next scholium.[32] > > In the above, as usual, motion is Newton's name for momentum, hence > > his careful distinction between motion and velocity. > > > Newton used the third law to derive the law of conservation of > > momentum;[33] however from a deeper perspective, conservation of > > momentum is the more fundamental idea (derived via Noether's theorem > > from Galilean invariance), and holds in cases where Newton's third > > law appears to fail, for instance when force fields as well as > > particles carry momentum, and in quantum mechanics.
'Laws of motion' implies that motion is done in accordance with certain laws.
Motion is independent of the law.
Reaction  Actions
Dependent  Independent
Rest  Motion
Linear  Curvature
Law  Unlawful
So, we don't say motion is dependent on a law but rather the law depends upon the unlawful independent motion.
Solution  Problem
Fixed  Moving
Motion is the problem, the universal fixed law is the solution.
(Universal Fixed Law C = Motion Variables XY)
Looking at this picture:
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=613c2d19007c3515&id=613C2D19007C3515!2705&sff=1&authkey=!AHlp2dQyYDTYiII
The universal fixed law is the straight line through the middle. The curving disks rotate around that fixed line 'independently'.
Looking at this picture:
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=613c2d19007c3515&id=613C2D19007C3515!2704&sff=1&authkey=!AKJWRMkUfwi9lcs
Here, there are star system disks. Where the star system discs are alive and actively rotating they cut off the straight line with a white hot centre. Because they break the straight line those star systems can be referred to as breaking the law.
Actually, motion acts independently of the law.
The law is a



