Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Antiderivative in Calculus #4 Textbook 6th ed.: TRUE CALCULUS;
without the phony limit concept

Replies: 0

 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Posts: 18,572 Registered: 3/31/08
Antiderivative in Calculus #4 Textbook 6th ed.: TRUE CALCULUS;
without the phony limit concept

Posted: Jun 15, 2013 4:18 PM

Let me first give what this Antiderivative rule or technique
(sometimes called the Power formula) is. Let me give it to the High
School student, so that they know up front what he or she is aiming
for.

It is all a matter of geometry of angles involved with coordinate
points and the area under the graph.

Antiderivative Technique (Power ?formula)

(1) for the derivative of a function x^n the derivative is
n(x)^(n-1).

(2) for the integral the antiderivative works backward. So for x^n,
the antiderivative is (1/(n +1)(x^(n+1))

The High School student is aiming for that rule listed above.

The High School student is going to work with the function
y=x to derive that rule.

So graph the function in 10 Grid of integers only which looks like
this of a diagonal that cuts the graph in half at a 45 degree angle:

. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . x . . . . . . .
. . x . . . . . . . .
. x . . . . . . . . .
x . . . . . . . . . .
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

So the derivative is the slope or the dy/dx and since the dy equals
the dx,
we have a derivative of 1. So how do we make a rule which starts from
y = x and ends up with a derivative denoted as y', so that y'= 1? How
do we get from y = x to y'=1?

How do we obtain the rule of n(x)^(n-1) starting from x^n, where the n
in our case is n=1 for y = x ?

Well, y=x is really that of y=x^1 and what we want is x^1 be that of
1.
So we take the exponent of 1 to be a coefficient, and then we take the
function of x^1 and subtract 1 from the exponent, of x^(1-1) giving us
x^0 and in math, x^0 =1.

So we have 1 * x^0 which is 1*1 or just 1.

So for y=x the derivative is 1(x)^(1-1) which is x^0 which is 1.

For the integral in the graph we easily add up 1/2 squares and whole
squares to find the area under the graph. So for x= 3 we have 3 full
whole squares and then we have 3 half squares for a total of 4.5
squares area. And the antiderivative formula for integral is 1/2x^2,
so here the x=3 and if we plug into that formula we see we have
1/2(3*3) = 1/2(9) = 4.5 square area.

We instantly see that the graph of the function y= x is an expanding
1/2 of an ever expanding square with a 1 by 1 square, then a 2 by 2
square then a 3 by 3 square etc etc. So the Integral formula for y = x
is that of 1/2x^2 because we all know from geometry that a right
triangle area is 1/2 base times height and our right triangles have
bases and heights that are equal to each other, so we have 1/2x^2. So
how in mathematics do we go from y=x to a function of Int = 1/2x^2? (I
abbreviate the derivative function as y' and I abbreviate the integral
function as Int.)

We do it by having the power formula for x^n, the coefficient be 1/(n
+1).
So that for y=x^1, the coefficient is 1/(1+1) which is 1/2. And then
the remainder of the power formula of x^n we increase the exponent by
1. In integration we increase the exponent by 1 whereas in
differentiation we decrease it by 1.

For y=x the integral we have the coefficient as (1/(1+1)), and we
have x^(1+1) which when combined is 1/2x^2. Now to see if that is
correct we take the derivative of that to see if it lands us back to
the original function y= x. So we have 2(1/2)x^(2-1) which surely is
x.

Now, the bright High School student is going to wonder why I used y=x
and not used y=x^2 for the antiderivative. And the answer is
complicated for the function y=x^2 is far more complicated in using
0.1 and 0.2 than is y=x which does not involve fractions. But also,
because True Calculus has no curves, only tiny straightline segments,
and in the 10-Grid, my tiny straightline segments are only
approximately the derivative and integral for y = x^2, whereas in the
function y=x, it is a overall straightline function. The function
y=x^2 is not an overall straightline function but rather a function of
a combined tiny straightline segments. That is an important statement
in True Calculus. Some functions are overall straightline functions
such as y=3 or y=x, but many functions are overall a combination of
tiny straightline segments such as y = x^2 or y= 1/x or y = sine x or
y = cosine x.

Calculus without the limit concept has no curves, but rather has tiny
straightline segments and when those segments are 1*10^-603 of a
distance, the approximations become equality. At that small of a
distance
of 10^-603 we have a 10^603 regular polygon equalling a circle, where
no curves exist in Euclidean Geometry.

Calculus with the limit concept would have you believe that the
integral is the summation of line segments which have no internal
area. And where the derivative is always running into trouble because
its neighboring points are an infinity set of points that lead to what
is described in math as pathological functions like the Weierstrass
function or the function y = sin(1/x).

In True Calculus, the derivative itself connects a point with its
immediate neighboring point on the leftside of the graph and its
immediate neighboring point on the rightside of the graph. In the
phony calculus of limit concept, the derivative was never a part of
the function, but in True Calculus, the derivative is a part of the
function itself for it connects successive points, and since it is a
straightline segment then there are no curved lines in Calculus, nor
in Euclidean Geometry.

Now what do I teach next? Do I teach the integral? Or do I teach the
importance of the angle involved in Calculus. What I mean is that the
derivative is the angle involved between successive points of the
graph, so that in the function y=x, the derivative is a 45 degree
angle between successive points of the graph. So how is 45 degrees
expressed as y' = 1 for the function y=x? So, what is the logical
order for the next discussion? Do I do the integral and integration,
or do I talk about the huge importance that coordinate points of a
graph in the Cartesian Coordinate System of Euclidean Geometry allows
the Calculus to exist because of fixed angles? Let me ponder which is
the better logical order.
--

More than 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search archive from May 2012 to May 2013. Drexel
University's Math Forum has done a far better job and many of those
missing Google posts can be seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies