The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Re: All mathematics (in the universe) is just increase or decrease...
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
GS Chandy

Posts: 8,307
From: Hyderabad, Mumbai/Bangalore, India
Registered: 9/29/05
Re: All mathematics (in the universe) is just increase or decrease...
Posted: Jun 17, 2013 11:54 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Donald Saulter posted Jun 18, 2013 2:33 AM:
> > (Jonathan Crabtree) Did someone REALLY say all math
> > was just additionand multiplication?

> Yes I did. But I'd be quite interested in seeing you
> work your way through the problem on my web page
> using no concepts other than "increase" and
> "decrease".
> Thanks.
> Donald Sauter

Ok. I have read through your problem as solved at your website using just 'addition' and 'multiplication'. You are not wrong.

However, I observe that a similar remark could be made in relation to practically any problem in, say, 'Differential or Integral Calculus' (or 'Calculus of Variations'; or 'Linear Algebra'; or 'Theory of Groups'; or 'Galois Theory'; or Algebraic Topology; or any other topic in 'advanced math') and your suggestion that "all math is just 'additions' and 'multiplication'- . I believe that practically any problem in any of these fields could (over time) be solved using just '+' and 'x'.

Similar remarks could also be made in relation to any math problem and my thought that "all math is just '1', '0' and 'addition'.

(No, I am NOT about to try to use either your '+' and 'x' - or my thought either - on ANY math problem).

The reason being that, in either case, it would just be a pain in watchayoumaycallit to try to go this route. We should realise that math 'evolved' as it did over time, for some pretty sound reasons.

(I observe that Jonathan Crabtree has responded, 'more mathematically' (and very soundly), to your suggestion - see


Message was edited by: GS Chandy

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.