The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 288
Replies: 7   Last Post: Jun 21, 2013 11:07 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Alan Smaill

Posts: 1,103
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 288
Posted: Jun 21, 2013 10:05 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Julio Di Egidio" <> writes:

> "Alan Smaill" <> wrote in message

>> What's the relevance of the context?
>> I still don't know what pi is supposed to be counting, pi amount of what?
>> And Nelson's comments are specifically about natural numbers.

> The context was of course relevant, for instance to the relevance of
> Nelson's comment in it. Or to the fact that I was not advocating for
> ultra-finitism, by the way.
> So I just won't bother to explain what you appear to be ignoring, and
> even less the obvious, I just have a hunch that you are looking at
> this discussion on foundations from the wrong level of abstraction.

Or perhaps simply a different level of abstraction ...

> Julio

Alan Smaill

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.