Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: number problem
Replies: 30   Last Post: Jul 3, 2013 12:08 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 mathguy Posts: 12 Registered: 6/23/13
Re: number problem
Posted: Jun 24, 2013 1:05 AM

i meant max(S) <= 20000.

On Sunday, June 23, 2013 10:01:52 PM UTC-7, japo...@gmail.com wrote:
> well, if you read my first post, i wrote a program that confirms the conjecture is true for size of S <= 20000. The related putnam problem is unfortunately gone, as it's one of those problem of the day thing that I found on the web days ago.
>
>
>
> On Sunday, June 23, 2013 6:07:16 PM UTC-7, quasi wrote:
>

> > japonishi wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > >conjecture of mine. related but different from a
>
> >
>
> > >past putnam problem.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > I doubt that your conjecture is true.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > I suspect N can be arbitrarily large.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Aside from the difficulty of finding examples with N > 5, why
>
> >
>
> > do you think there should even be a maximum value of N?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Also, what is the year and problem number of the related Putnam
>
> >
>
> > problem?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > quasi

Date Subject Author
6/23/13 mathguy
6/23/13 Timothy Murphy
6/23/13 mathguy
6/24/13 Timothy Murphy
6/24/13 Virgil
6/23/13 quasi
6/23/13 mathguy
6/23/13 quasi
6/24/13 mathguy
6/24/13 mathguy
6/24/13 quasi
6/24/13 mathguy
6/24/13 Don Redmond
6/25/13 mathguy
6/25/13 quasi
6/26/13 mathguy
6/27/13 quasi
6/28/13 mathguy
6/28/13 Tucsondrew@me.com
6/28/13 Peter Percival
6/28/13 quasi
6/30/13 mathguy
6/30/13 Peter Percival
6/30/13 quasi
6/30/13 Bart Goddard
6/30/13 Virgil
7/2/13 mathguy
7/2/13 Bart Goddard
7/2/13 quasi
7/2/13 quasi
7/3/13 Bart Goddard