The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Math Topics » alt.math.recreational

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: A question on sets (and possible fallacy)
Replies: 2   Last Post: Jun 29, 2013 9:03 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Cory Smith

Posts: 1
From: Purdue
Registered: 6/25/13
A question on sets (and possible fallacy)
Posted: Jun 25, 2013 10:45 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Let Set A contain everything.

Let Set B contain nothing.

Is Set B a subset of Set A?

I really don't know how to go about looking at this. Set A seems like it must contain Set B since any set would be a subset of something containing everything. However, if Set B were a subset of Set A, wouldn't that mean it would need to contain something?

I feel like somewhere along the line, I started looking at this wrong and have assumed some sort of logical fallacy.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.