Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
CONFIRMATION THAT ALL PRIME NUMBERS CAN BE WRITTEN BY HAND EQUATION IN THIER SPIRAL PLACEMENT INFINATUM IN CONTINUOUS MODE
Replies:
0




CONFIRMATION THAT ALL PRIME NUMBERS CAN BE WRITTEN BY HAND EQUATION IN THIER SPIRAL PLACEMENT INFINATUM IN CONTINUOUS MODE
Posted:
Jul 2, 2013 8:37 PM


It is also confirmed that the tangent to each number is specific to a spiral and that they can be hand calculated from bottom up. Now The Author will wait for his paper to be published by Princeton ( Annals of Mathematics and IJAMR). After that if current mathematics concedes defeat and abandon the Riemanns linear ascension of prime numbers, we will demomnstrate this to the world of mathematics.
All work is by the grace of Lord Jesus Christ and the Humility of Mother Mary. We have no reason to hide our work which is open for review , and the abstract is as under
THE POISON PILL OF CURRENT MATHEMATICS THEORY, DELIVERED ( The concordance of numbers spirals and Prime numbers spirals) Author: Vinoo Cameron M.D Hope research, Athens, Wisconsin, USA. Email:.com
ABSTRACT: The author had receded to discover the calculus of spirals, and then this discovery hit him, cutting short the calculus. The findings of concordance between natural linear numbers and prime numbers are so blatant, that this manuscript though primarily submitted to the Annals of Mathematics, it is submitted as a Diaspora between two mathematical Journals, ?Annals of Mathematics Princeton University?, and International journal of applied Mathematical research?. The manuscript however is primarily meant to alert Annals of mathematics journal, Princeton University to a fact of mathematics (gong!).This manuscript is about the basics of the correct spiral placement of prime numbers and completely rejects the current linear mathematics with regard to Prime numbers, even though there is some abject work on prime number distribution over the last two centuries including the work of Riemann, but all that is irrelevant with regards to the reality of numbers mathematics. The facts are even evident on a very special ,a novel Prime number sieve of Theo Denotter , who had done this for Hope research . The author is a physician/surgeon, who in later life decided to look into the circus of mathematics after his son was misdiagnosed because of an error in simple mathematics related to a torsion deformity of the spine. The author in this short manuscript is concerned about mathematics, and not its current pedigree, and current writing modes. The author is recently published and offers a fresh look at mathematics and clearly suggests that current mathematics is all wet in its pursuit of the final discovery in mathematics. The author points out for the sake of mathematics this perpetuated obsession that Prime numbers are somehow random by linear ascension, is Poppy cock! The author in very simple mathematics, presents a simple evidence that by definition Prime numbers cannot be random (as is vastly proven in his publications), as their gaps are rational, divisible by 2 in several ways. The mathematical readers can deduce that by examination of the evidence presented here and the readers are referenced to the much more complex papers recently published, the understanding of which (may) be beyond the reach of current mathematicians. KEY WORDS: Random prime numbers, rational prime numbers, Pythagoras triangle1:3, revision of trigonometry, error of mathematics.



