Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology � 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 9, 2013 2:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de

Posts: 15,052
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 9, 2013 6:07 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 00:59:26 UTC+2, Virgil wrote:

> Consider the strictly increasing sequence f(n) = (n-1)/n.

> While there is never a last term to that sequence, but when one has increases to 1, one has past by all the terms of that sequence.


The limit 1 will never be reached by passing through infinitely many terms. The limit 1 only says that no term will be 1 but many terms will come as close as you like.


It is impossible to reach pi by its rational approximations. It is impossible to define Cantor's diagonal by digits. All its digits belong to rational approximations. But all rational approximations can be in a rationals-complete list. Therefore Cantor's diagonal argument fails:

For every index n exist infinitely many lines k such that the FIS of the diagonal is in such a line k:
d_1, d_2, d_3, ..., d_n = q_k1, q_k2, q_k3, ..., q_kn.

Since it is impossible to find digits of D that are not innfinitely many lines together too, the belief in the existence of d is of the same sort as the belief in the existence of devils.


Regards, WM



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.