Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum


Math Forum
 Ask Dr. Math
 Discussions
 Internet Newsletter
 MathTools
 Problems of the Week
 Teacher2Teacher
 Teacher Exchange
 Workshops

Search All of the Math Forum:
Browse our Internet Mathematics Library

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 12, 2013 6:58 PM

Advanced Search
Reply to this Topic Reply to this Topic

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Michael Klemm

Posts: 41
Registered: 11/13/12
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 12, 2013 2:23 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Julio Di Egidio wrote:

> WM would not agree there is a last one, mind the confusion. Indeed, I
> think he is quite correct here: he is saying "to have *all*" we need an
> "end-signal", which looks perfectly sensible, IMO.

The urn-paradoxon can be visualised by modern LED leading systems,
see http://www.e-o-s.de/UBahnNrnbergZiegelstein.htm for an example.
The warning light signals increase to infinity with increasing danger
limiting in a calm red when the train has stopped.

Regards
Michael

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.