The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 12, 2013 6:58 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 4,165
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 12, 2013 5:36 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Michael Klemm" <> wrote in message
> Julio Di Egidio wrote:

>> WM would not agree there is a last one, mind the confusion. Indeed, I
>> think he is quite correct here: he is saying "to have *all*" we need an
>> "end-signal", which looks perfectly sensible, IMO.

> The urn-paradoxon can be visualised by modern LED leading systems,
> see for an example.
> The warning light signals increase to infinity with increasing danger
> limiting in a calm red when the train has stopped.

I cannot read German, but I couldn't see anything like a technical
description of that setup. Was there supposed to be an argument? Anything
related to the discussion at hand?


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.