"Michael Klemm" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:email@example.com... > Julio Di Egidio wrote: > >> WM would not agree there is a last one, mind the confusion. Indeed, I >> think he is quite correct here: he is saying "to have *all*" we need an >> "end-signal", which looks perfectly sensible, IMO. > > The urn-paradoxon can be visualised by modern LED leading systems, > see http://www.e-o-s.de/UBahnNrnbergZiegelstein.htm for an example. > The warning light signals increase to infinity with increasing danger > limiting in a calm red when the train has stopped.
I cannot read German, but I couldn't see anything like a technical description of that setup. Was there supposed to be an argument? Anything related to the discussion at hand?