The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 12, 2013 6:58 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Michael Klemm

Posts: 133
Registered: 11/13/12
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 12, 2013 7:55 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Julio Di Egidio" <> wrote in message
> "Michael Klemm" <> wrote in message
> news:kro7dg$pq4$

>> Julio Di Egidio wrote:

>>> WM would not agree there is a last one, mind the confusion. Indeed, I
>>> think he is quite correct here: he is saying "to have *all*" we need an
>>> "end-signal", which looks perfectly sensible, IMO.

>> The urn-paradoxon can be visualised by modern LED leading systems,
>> see for an example.
>> The warning light signals increase to infinity with increasing danger
>> limiting in a calm red when the train has stopped.

> I cannot read German, but I couldn't see anything like a technical
> description of that setup. Was there supposed to be an argument?
> Anything related to the discussion at hand?
> Julio

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.