Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 27   Last Post: Jul 12, 2013 6:58 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Michael Klemm

Posts: 80
Registered: 11/13/12
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 12, 2013 7:55 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


"Julio Di Egidio" <julio@diegidio.name> wrote in message
news:kroibg$78k$1@dont-email.me...
> "Michael Klemm" <m_f_klemm@t-online.de> wrote in message
> news:kro7dg$pq4$1@solani.org...

>> Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>

>>> WM would not agree there is a last one, mind the confusion. Indeed, I
>>> think he is quite correct here: he is saying "to have *all*" we need an
>>> "end-signal", which looks perfectly sensible, IMO.

>>
>> The urn-paradoxon can be visualised by modern LED leading systems,
>> see http://www.e-o-s.de/UBahnNrnbergZiegelstein.htm for an example.
>> The warning light signals increase to infinity with increasing danger
>> limiting in a calm red when the train has stopped.

>
> I cannot read German, but I couldn't see anything like a technical
> description of that setup. Was there supposed to be an argument?
> Anything related to the discussion at hand?
>
> Julio
>
>





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.