The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 300
Replies: 12   Last Post: Jul 22, 2013 3:19 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Michael Klemm

Posts: 133
Registered: 11/13/12
Re: Matheology § 300
Posted: Jul 19, 2013 4:18 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

>> WM wrote:
>>> Would you think that the Binary Tree containing only all rational
>>> numbers is impossible?

>> A binary tree containing all finite initial path segments of the complete
>> binary tree contains, although no rational numbers,

> That is correct. Real numbers cannot be defined by finite initial segments
> of infinite paths (and they cannot be defined by infinite paths). Every
> real number needs a finite definition like "0.5 and only zeros following".

Path have verices and edges and real numbers have no such things.

>> a lot of other things, for example pairs of paths or paths beginnig on
>> level 13 and ending on level 17.

> You appear to have your own understandig of "paths". A path in the
> infinity Binary Tree is, in mathematics, an infinite path containing the
> root node. Sometimes also finite initial segments are called paths, but
> each one starts at the root node.

It is you who can not distinguish between paths with one end and paths with
two ends.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.