The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Proving archimedian property from "dedekind complete + orderer field"
Replies: 3   Last Post: Jul 28, 2013 12:55 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 55
Registered: 3/18/07
Proving archimedian property from "dedekind complete + orderer field"
Posted: Jul 28, 2013 6:16 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

I'm confused as to why the archimedian property (unbounded natural numbers in reals) needs to be proven from {least upper bound property + ordered field}"

Aren't the naturals "obviously" infinite (meaning provable without all the other machinery)? Because n+1 is bigger than n which are different natural numbers (you can prove n+1 > n > 0 using the order properties of reals).

Is it my understanding that this proof is intended to exclude any case where the naturals could wrap around on each other like 1+1+1...+1=0 in a finite field?
Why can't we prove that from the totality properly of the order < ?

How would one prove that the naturals inside the rationals (without the sup property which is used in the proof I talk about above) is unbounded above?

Thanks for the help.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.