The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: So Kirby folds
Replies: 4   Last Post: Aug 8, 2013 11:24 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Anna Roys

Posts: 608
Registered: 2/1/07
Re: So Kirby folds
Posted: Aug 8, 2013 4:54 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply
att1.html (1.0 K)

Kirby, please do not fold. Instead explain your thinking more completely.
Respectfully, Anna

On Wednesday, August 7, 2013, GS Chandy <> wrote:
> "So Kirby folds" --Frank Zubek
> Oh, really?
> The way I understood it was that you had made some claims to the effect

that you had rubbished Buckminster Fuller (and Kirby along with him) - and
you had put up some utterly incomprehensible arguments in support on a
whole number of issues.
> I'm afraid didn't see Kirby "folding" at all. I am not very

knowledgeable about "Synergetics", etc (though I had once build a few
geodesic domes of various sizes), so I am not competent to judge your
claims. I believe I'll need to see a definitive statement from Kirby to
this effect: "I fold". Your claim does not quite serve the purpose.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.