Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Topic: seriously
Replies: 2   Last Post: Aug 19, 2013 7:26 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 frank zubek Posts: 222 Registered: 5/12/09
seriously
Posted: Aug 18, 2013 3:17 PM

Kirby you keep on posting how the cube is almost of the unit tet. volume.

I keep I saying, that cube HAS no relation you just insisting to make a relation where there is none.

Say a cube of vol. 729 I remember this from the taxi cab number 1729.

a cube of 729 vol. has a edge of 9 that is the actual cube I using. its face diagonal is (2)sqr2 and a cube made of edge sqr2 which is exactly 1/2 the cube face diagonal indeed is ALMOST 94% of the tet. vol.
but this cube is a SCP have a vid. showing when we using SAME spheres to stack so that cube is of SCP whereas the tetrahedron you refering to is from a CCP cube and this can NOT be done any other way.
GSC loves to study synergetcis but he fails to see ANY problems with your insisting for the x.y.z. cube to be of these parameters so you and synergetics is trying to justify some relation where there is none.
Models are models, yes you can talk around them but you can not dislodge a empirical evidence a empirical fact when using identical spheres.
GSC; a cube = 3 tet. vol. and there is SOME cube that can be of 2 tet. vol. but such cube is unrelated, why you not noticing the problem, the proposition is totally unrelated. Kirby has a rh. triconta = 7.5 tet. vol. but also 5 tet. volumes, it is completely unrelated, I can make some cube to be of vol. 1 tetra. is there a cube that can be of vol. of SOME reg. tet. yes we can make cubes or tetras of any vol. but they are not related unless the cube = to 3 tet. vol. NOW THAN THE CUBE AND A TETRA ARE RELATED, why is this so hard to comprehend.

fz

Date Subject Author
8/18/13 frank zubek
8/19/13 kirby urner
8/19/13 GS Chandy