Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.

Topic: electric charge becomes the arrangement of magnetic monopoles #1537
New Physics #1887 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 0

 Search Thread: Advanced Search

 plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Posts: 7,943 Registered: 3/31/08
electric charge becomes the arrangement of magnetic monopoles #1537
New Physics #1887 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Sep 18, 2013 8:44 PM
 Plain Text Reply

A long time ago I argued that electric charge was the geometry of space around a particle, so that -1 charge electrons meant a hyperbolic geometry and a +1 proton meant a elliptic geometry. I could not elaborate on that because I was not prepared to have the units of the Maxwell Equations be magnetic monopoles. I am prepared now to follow through with that idea. Hyperbolic geometry can be seen as a closed loop wire, a thin torus (wire) with its hole. A Elliptic geometry can be seen as a sphere or ellipsoid surface. It need not be a solid but just a surface enclosed. Euclidean geometry is where you combine the wire and the ellipsoid together, like a peg fitting into a hole.

So in this earlier post below, I talk about where a quantity of magnetic monopoles composes a electric charge, but here, quantity is not enough, for those monopoles have to be arranged in a geometry of +1 or -1 for there to be a full electric charge.

A few hours ago in sci.physics, I wrote:

Capacitors when you have magnetic monopoles #1536 New Physics #1886 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Now in Old Physics, the physicists were so silly and stupid as to eject the Maxwell Equations as not even true and valid for Quantum Mechanics. In New Physics, we recognize that Quantum Mechanics is silly and stupid for it is nothing more than the Maxwell Equations deriving those principles of QM.

But in New Physics, we have to revise the Maxwell Equations a bit, since the Old Maxwell Equations did not have magnetic monopoles.

When we add magnetic monopoles to the Maxwell Equations we alter them terrifically. For we no longer have a Electric Field, but just a Magnetic Field because the magnetic monopoles create electric charge and it is electric charge that is an Electric field.

So in New Physics, a photon and neutrino are pure waves, not particles. To become a particle, a wave has to have at minimum a 0.5*10^6 magnetic monopoles and then that wave is a electron particle. And since it owns 0.5*10^6 magnetic monopoles it is a -1 electric charge and thus we can say it has a electric field of a 0.5*10^6 magnetic field.

So in New Physics, we have nothing but magnetic fields and magnetic monopoles and when those numbers are large enough, the magnetic field is a electric charge and a electric field.

Now we do not have to mention ever again a Electric field or electric charge if we state how many magnetic monopoles in a structure there are. But that is very cumbersome, so we continue to use the term electric charge and electric field only because we are too much burdened by listing the monopoles and their structure.

Now experimental physics is going to easily prove what I have said above in the phenomenon of Capacitor. The capacitor in Old Physics used the explanation of the Coulomb force in Gauss's law of electricity, only problem there was that electric currents are never at rest but in motion, and in a capacitor (sic) electrons and protons (nuclei) are at rest. The solution to that dilemma is that the Capacitor is not explained by Gauss's law of electricity, but rather by Gauss's law of magnetism with magnetic monopoles. In magnets, you do and can have electrons not as current flow but as orbital valence electrons.

So in New Physics, the capacitor is not explained by Coulomb law but by Gauss's law of magnetism which creates the Coulomb law from magnetic monopoles.

Archimedes Plutonium ?http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium ?whole entire Universe is just one big atom ?where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.