Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re: Godels theorems end in paradox (1)
Posted:
Sep 19, 2013 8:57 AM


On Septembre 19, 2013, sperm...@yahoo.com wrote: > Australias leading erotic poet colin leslie dean has shown Godels theorem ends in 2 paradoxes > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/32970323/Godelsincompletenesstheoreminvalidillegitimate > > > > Paradox 1\ > > Godels theorem proved that provability is not the same a truth > > Ie truth of a maths statement is independent of its proof > > or > > provabilitywithinthetheoryT is not the same as truth > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Meaning_of_the_first_incompleteness_theorem > > ?Any effectively generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In particular, for any consistent, effectively generated formal theory that proves certain basic arithmetic truths, there is an arithmetical statement that is true,[1] but not provable in the theory (Kleene 1967, p. 250) > > For each consistent formal theory T having the required small amount of number theory > > ? provabilitywithinthetheoryT is not the same as truth; the theory T is incomplete. > > > > It is shown by colin leslie dean that Godels theorem ends in paradox > > > > it is said godel PROVED > > "there are mathematical true statements which cant be proven" > > in other words > > truth does not equate with proof. > > quote "? provabilitywithinthetheoryT is not the same as truth; the theory T is incomplete." > > > > thus > > > > if that theorem is true > > then his theorem is false > > > > PROOF > > for if the theorem is true > > then truth does equate with proof as he has given proof of a true > > statement > > but his theorem says > > truth does not equate with proof. > > thus a paradox
Posting the same crap again and again won't make it true.



