The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Study with multi-level rank order
Replies: 1   Last Post: Oct 7, 2013 2:01 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 6
Registered: 12/11/04
Study with multi-level rank order
Posted: Oct 1, 2013 7:15 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Three levels of hierarchy were identified based on the findings of extensive exploration i.e.

Category......composed of Areas
And Area are .....further composed of Factors

1. In confirmatory survey, practitioners were asked to rank Categories within themselves (Level 1 rank order).
2. Then they were supposed to rank the Areas within each Category (Level 2 rank order). For example:

Category 1 (has Area11, Area12, Area13,....)
Category 2 (has Area21, Area22, Area23,....)
And so on....

3.Within each area, factors were asked to be ranked (Level 3 rank order).

For each Area we have
Area11 (has Factor111, Factor112, Factor113....)
Area12 (has Factor121, Factor122, Factor123....)
And so on....

All identified items were theoretically orthogonal and no rank order had more than 7 items. We applied Kendall?s W at every level separately.

Statistically, can it be objectionable? Is there any other rank order test suitable to given scenario?

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.