The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.stat.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: An overwhelming statement Reporting to a Re: How to simulate
Cauchy sa

Replies: 0  

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Luis A. Afonso

Posts: 4,758
From: LIsbon (Portugal)
Registered: 2/16/05
An overwhelming statement Reporting to a Re: How to simulate
Cauchy sa

Posted: Oct 1, 2013 1:37 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

An overwhelming statement

Reporting to a Re: How to simulate Cauchy samples Posted: May 8, 2008 7:54 AM
From Jack Tomsky:
_____These are not confidence intervals on the median. Since you're assuming that the population median is known to be zero, the confidence interval for the median is [0, 0] for all confidence levels. Jack (moderator)
I think that this statement should be fully discussed by two main reasons:
___1) It could be understood as the simulation Monte Carlo is wrong/unuseful/dangerous.
___2) The sampling of simulated data *losses/harms* its mainly valuable property of to be random.

___1) A not really strong argument is that Monte Carlo in Statistics/ NHST is used since early sixties, any contest was appeared. Remember that an early paper on the issue is authorized by Hubert Lilliefors who adapted Kolmogorov- Smirnov normal test to the case where the parameters are unknown, so estimated by data itself.
___2) About randomness.
Given the (Cumulative) Distribution Function of the r.v. X, F(X<=x0) = g(x0; a,b, ...), a, b, ... parameters, we can invert then to obtain the result: Prob. (x0<= a) = G(F(a)) where G is the inverse function of the CDF. Now let be F= random on [0,1], then we have Prob.(x0<= a) = G(random). Given a random number u and evaluating G(u) we get easily the value x0 which is *at random*, exactly and unquestionably.

Jack Tomsky´s argument that because I let the median as zero the C.I, is [0, 0] is completely worthless. I am full free to chose the parameter´s values at my criterion, to pick what model I want to work with.

Luis A. Afonso

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.