Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: Sequence limit
Replies: 72   Last Post: Nov 26, 2013 12:07 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 quasi Posts: 11,910 Registered: 7/15/05
Re: Sequence limit
Posted: Oct 3, 2013 5:42 PM

konyberg wrote:
>quasi wrote:
>> quasi wrote:
>> >konyberg wrote:
>> >>Bart Goddard wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> What is lim_{n -> oo} |sin n|^(1/n)
>> >>>
>> >>> where n runs through the positive integers.
>> >>>
>> >>> Calculus techniques imply the answer is 1.
>> >>> But the same techniques imply the answer is 1
>> >>> if n is changed to x, a real variable, and that
>> >>> is not the case, since sin x =0 infinitely often.
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone wrestled with the subtlies of this problem?
>> >>>
>> >>> E.g., can you construct a subsequence n_k such
>> >>>
>> >>> that sin (n_k) goes to zero so fast that the
>> >>> exponent can't pull it up to 1?

>> >>
>> >>In general a^0 = 1. lim (n goes inf) 1/n = 0. Then the value
>> >>of sin(n) doesn't change that a^0 = 1.

>> >
>> >
>> >Let f(n) = 1/(2^n).
>> >
>> >Then f(n)^(1/n) = 1/2 for all nonzero values of n,
>> >hence the limit, as n approaches infinity, of
>> >f(n)^(1/n) is 1/2, not 1.

>>
>> Are there infinitely many positive integers n such that
>>
>> |sin(n)| < 1/(2^n)
>>

>> >??
>> >
>> >If so, then the limit of the sequence
>> >
>> > |sin(n)|^(1/n), n = 1,2,3, ...
>> >
>> >does not exist. In particular, it would not be equal to 1.
>> >
>> >In fact, the original question can be recast as:
>> >
>> >Does there exist a real number c with 0 < c < 1 such that
>> >
>> >the inequality
>> >
>> > |sin(n)| < c^n
>> >
>> >holds for infinitely many positive integers n?

>
>Yes I was a bit hasty here. But sin(n) is limited from -1 to +1

Sure it is.

For positive integers n, the function

f(n) = 1/(2^n)

satisfies 0 < f(n) <= 1/2

>and the limit of 1/n is 0. I would think that the limit is 1.

I agree that in this case, the limit is probably equal to 1,

But in general, if f,g are functions such that, for all
positive integers n,

(1) 0 < |f(n)| <= 1
(2) 0 < g(n)
(3) g(n) --> 0 as n --> oo

the question as to whether or not the limit, as n --> oo, of

f(n)^g(n)

exists, and if so, to what value, cannot be answered without

In particular, for this question, it doesn't matter in the
least whether the expression 0^0 is regarded as either

undefined
equal to 1
equal to 0
equal to 1/2 (hey, split the difference)
equal to some other constant

>The debate will still be what 0^0 is equal to :)

Which has no relevance to the OP's question.

quasi

Date Subject Author
10/3/13 Bart Goddard
10/3/13 Karl-Olav Nyberg
10/3/13 quasi
10/3/13 quasi
10/3/13 Karl-Olav Nyberg
10/3/13 quasi
10/4/13 Roland Franzius
10/4/13 quasi
10/5/13 Roland Franzius
10/5/13 quasi
10/26/13 Roland Franzius
10/26/13 karl
10/26/13 Roland Franzius
10/26/13 gnasher729
10/27/13 karl
10/3/13 quasi
10/4/13 Leon Aigret
10/4/13 William Elliot
10/4/13 quasi
10/4/13 William Elliot
10/4/13 quasi
10/4/13 David C. Ullrich
10/4/13 Robin Chapman
10/5/13 Bart Goddard
10/4/13 Bart Goddard
10/4/13 Peter Percival
10/5/13 Virgil
10/4/13 Bart Goddard
10/6/13 David Bernier
10/6/13 Virgil
10/6/13 Bart Goddard
10/7/13 Mohan Pawar
10/7/13 Bart Goddard
10/7/13 gnasher729
10/7/13 Richard Tobin
10/7/13 Robin Chapman
10/7/13 Michael F. Stemper
10/7/13 Michael F. Stemper
10/7/13 David Bernier
10/7/13 fom
10/8/13 Virgil
10/8/13 fom
10/8/13 Virgil
10/8/13 fom
10/4/13 fom
10/4/13 quasi
10/4/13 quasi
10/9/13 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
10/10/13 Bart Goddard
11/5/13 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
11/6/13 Bart Goddard
11/11/13 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
11/12/13 Bart Goddard
11/15/13 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
11/15/13 Bart Goddard
11/6/13 Timothy Murphy
11/8/13 Bart Goddard
11/8/13 Paul
11/8/13 Bart Goddard
11/9/13 Paul
11/9/13 quasi
11/9/13 quasi
11/9/13 quasi
11/13/13 Timothy Murphy
11/13/13 quasi
11/14/13 Timothy Murphy
11/14/13 Virgil
11/14/13 Roland Franzius
11/26/13 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
11/9/13 Roland Franzius
11/9/13 Paul