The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Software » comp.soft-sys.matlab

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: NARX time delay estimation - take 2
Replies: 2   Last Post: Oct 24, 2013 4:03 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Greg Heath

Posts: 6,387
Registered: 12/7/04
Re: NARX time delay estimation - take 2
Posted: Oct 13, 2013 3:15 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Rad" wrote in message <l36u0h$g1d$>...
> Hello, I?m trying to determine the feedback and input delays for a 3-input 1-output NARX network using target-target auto-correlation and input/target cross-correlation, respectively.
> For the target-target autocorrelation, the max. lag is at 0, and the value of the auto-correlation coefficients decreases as the number of lags increase; therefore, I?m trying to determine the significant target-target auto-correlation lags by correlating the target with a random series and finding the 95% significance threshold ? thank you Greg for this recommendation.

ALL values above the threshold are significant. Start with the smallest significant lags and only use as many as you need.

> I tried this using a simple dataset (simpleseries_dataset, obtained using help nndatasets; 1- input 1-output, 100 observation) and it works fine.
> However, when I try the same approach with my data (attached to this post as target_data.xls; 3 inputs, 1 output, 32063 observations), I end up with a significant lag of 7810, which appears quite large to me.

Wrong approach. Find ALL significant input and feedback lags. Choose the smallest subset of the smallest significant lags that will yield acceptable results..

> If this is not the correct result, how can I determine the proper 95% significant threshold?

Your threshold calculation is probably ok. However, ALL correlations with absolute values greater than the threshold are significant.

> I posted the code and results here:

See my new reply there.

> Thank you for your help!

You are welcome.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.