The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: (infinity) A real story
Replies: 9   Last Post: Oct 17, 2013 6:56 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 4,165
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: (infinity) A real story
Posted: Oct 17, 2013 6:56 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Albrecht" <> wrote in message
> On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:06:55 AM UTC+2, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>> "fom" <> wrote in message
>> > You are correct concerning the necessity of infinity.
>> But, is he? "Actual infinity" is logically necessary, Zeno docet. And
>> quite reasonable too, just levels of abstraction.

> Oh, you are also live in the dream that Cantor has anything to do with
> Zeno's paradoxa? Okay. Give me an idea in which way "actual infinity"
> changes anything in that concern.

It's you who are still making confusion, infinite sets as only completed
sets is one thing, the uncountability of the reals is another, and completed
sets is not in fact Cantor's setting, despite overloads on terminology:
Cantor didn't use an extended set of naturals as the domain of his
functions. Then, whether extended sets (and non-well-founded ordinals? Oh
how I wish people would also concentrate sometimes on *matters of fact*, the
ones that count), change anything to the validity of Cantor's arguments is
just beside the present point, although I would guess it does not, really,
not just by itself.


Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.