The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Why do we use capital F for antiderivative?
Replies: 2   Last Post: Oct 25, 2013 11:11 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 24
Registered: 10/18/12
Why do we use capital F for antiderivative?
Posted: Oct 25, 2013 10:14 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Why do we use capital F for the antiderivative of f, instead of simply f?

Consider the general equation df/dt=g [1]

Note I assume f and g are scalar functions of t.

To find the function f whose derivative is g, we simply take the antiderivative of g. So (using int(X) for indefinite integral of X) we can integrate both sides of [1]:

int(df/dt)=int(g)=f+C [2]

Note the integral of df/dt is simply f(t) (with a constant added). So why is it conventional to use capital letter F for int(g), instead of just calling it f? That is, why add a '=F' to the end of [2]?

Why is this universal in the textbooks? What am I missing, as right now it looks like an unnecessary terminological layer, that even seems to hide the elegance of the relationship between the derivative and antiderivative?

Given its universality, I am assuming I am missing something. Please help!

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.