The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Education » math-teach

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: The Myth of 'I'm Bad at Math'
Replies: 14   Last Post: Nov 5, 2013 8:37 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Dave L. Renfro

Posts: 4,792
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: The Myth of 'I'm Bad at Math'
Posted: Nov 4, 2013 10:21 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Jerry P. Becker posted:

> *********************************
> From The Nation, Monday, October 28, 2013. See
> *********************************
> The Myth of 'I'm Bad at Math'
> Basic ability in the subject isn't the product of good genes, but hard work.
> By Miles Kimball and Noah Smith
> "I'm just not a math person."
> We hear it all the time. And we've had enough.
> Because we believe that the idea of "math people"
> is the most self-destructive idea in America
> today.


> 2. On the first few tests, the well-prepared
> kids get perfect scores, while the unprepared
> kids get only what they could figure out by
> winging it-maybe 80 or 85%, a solid B.

I see that Robert Hansen [1] has beat me to this,
but I still feel compelled to comment.

O-K, I don't get it. If they can get a solid B by
winging it, wouldn't this argue that the unprepared
kids are "math people"? If not, and the grades are so
inflated so as to be meaningless, then I don't see the
point of mentioning the grades, at least not without providing
some indication to the reader what the grades really represent.

Maybe Kimball/Smith are not "writing people"?


Dave L. Renfro

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.