Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0
Replies: 6   Last Post: Nov 17, 2013 5:05 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Dan Christensen

Posts: 2,229
Registered: 7/9/08
Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0
Posted: Nov 17, 2013 3:36 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sunday, November 17, 2013 3:22:51 PM UTC-5, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
> "Dan Christensen" <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>
> news:aef9b03a-e67f-4765-9f67-cb591a98b1cb@googlegroups.com...
>

> > On Sunday, November 17, 2013 2:55:58 PM UTC-5, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>
> >> "Dan Christensen" <Dan_Christensen@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>
> >> news:668d009c-e06b-4e3c-8571-86a92e5375c5@googlegroups.com...
>
> >>
>
> >> > I have formally proven that for all x0 in N (including 0), there exists
>
> >> > an
>
> >> > exponent-like functions ^ such that:
>
> >>
>
> >> Such that "any number works": exactly what I had explained.
>
> >
>
> > That's pretty much what we mean by 0^0 being undefined.
>
>
>
> No, it is not, which has been the main objection all along.
>


Let's face it, you have more or less ruled out 0^0 being undefined. There is no convincing you.

Dan
Download my DC Proof 2.0 software at http://www.dcproof.com
Visit my new math blog at http://www.dcproof.wordpress.com






Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.