Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0
Replies: 8   Last Post: Nov 18, 2013 10:49 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
LudovicoVan

Posts: 3,201
From: London
Registered: 2/8/08
Re: Formal proof of the ambiguity of 0^0
Posted: Nov 18, 2013 6:46 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"Peter Percival" <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:l6e8ma$hp1$5@news.albasani.net...
> Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>> "Peter Percival" <peterxpercival@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:l6e75r$hp1$1@news.albasani.net...

>>> Dan Christensen wrote:
>>>

>>>> While 0^0 = 1 may make sense in some applications, it doesn't make
>>>> sense if you are trying to formalize the notion repeated
>>>> multiplication of natural numbers. As I have shown here, it is only
>>>> one of infinite possibilities.

>>>
>>> You count 0 among the natural numbers, don't you? If you can multiply
>>> any finite number of numbers together, say n of them, then the case n
>>> = So if you multiply the numbers in the empty set together what do you
>>> get?

>>
>> Back to square one?? Congratulations to you, too: troll and spammer.

>
> Why do you think I'm a troll and a spammer?


I have just said it, now fuck off.

Julio





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.