Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Matheology § 413
Replies:
13
Last Post:
Jan 15, 2014 7:58 PM



Virgil
Posts:
8,833
Registered:
1/6/11


Re: WMytheology � 413
Posted:
Dec 31, 2013 4:12 PM


In article <a4e927f50139409487ece47412a42b70@googlegroups.com>, mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote:
> Irrational numbers have no decimal (or binary or whatever > integerpositivebase) expansion.
x = Sum 1/10^(n!) IS the expansion of a different irrational number in every different base.
So in one line there are infinitely many counterexamples to WM's claim.
> It is impossible for an infinite list of > decimals to appear in mathematical discourse, dialogue, or monologue other > than as the finite rule how to calculate *every* decimal at a finite place > but never *all* decimal, since beyond every finite index there are infinitely > many further indices.
So in one line there are infinitely many counterexamples to WM's claim. nswered: Both your assertions above are incorrect. > > Wouldn't that claim oblige him, in crankfree mathematics, to support his > opinion by listing all decimals of a nonterminating decimal representation of > a real number of his choice?
A finite rule for finding all infinitely many is quite sufficient everywhere in the crankfree mathematics that exists only outside the wild weird world of WMytheology. 



