
Re: Physics Journal gets maths wrong? No surprise?
Posted:
Jan 19, 2014 7:05 PM


I like to call it, big phi; it is in the icosahedron, just like phi, is, but it is inherently spatial
> The current best estimate for it is 1.902160583104 but this is based on > > extrapolation; there may be a proof showing it cannot be more than ~2.2, > > provided another conjecture (Riemann2) it is true. > > > > That the constant is not just finite but a small number proves that TPs thin > > out very sharply, not that the number of TPs is either finite or infinite.

