
Re: Why does Cantor's diagonal argument not fail? Two proofs, no disproofs!
Posted:
Jan 22, 2014 6:55 AM


On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 23:49:03 UTC+1, Virgil wrote: > In article <a880c545bda44a90a8483f50dd27d683@googlegroups.com>, > > mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 01:06:56 UTC+1, wpih...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > So for every line of the list, L, the antidiagonal of the list is > > > > not equal to L. > > > For every! Yes. But not for all. > > > > If WM claims "not for all", he must either be able to cite an exception, > > or be wrong! > > > > WM has yet to cite any exceptions. .... > See § 422.
Regards, WM

