
Re: Why Mathematics contradicts set theory
Posted:
Jan 22, 2014 8:20 AM


On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 13:57:37 UTC+1, Port563 wrote: > <mueckenh@rz.fhaugsburg.de> wrote... > > > a potential list is never completed such that you can never say anything > > > for all integers. This is tantamount that you cannot exclude anything > > > and say that no integer of the list can satisfy the requirement of a > > > certain proof. > > > > By analogy, therefore, at the other end of the scale, in your mathematics > > a point cannot exist, as it has no dimensions which means everything is > > excluded.
If a point has coordinates, it exists  like every finite or finitely defined potentially infinite list. > > > > If there's no point, then instead of this trolling garbage why don't you > > participate in sensible discussion and work, e.g., ""Good" primes  > > conjectures and results",
My time is limited. So I choose what I consider the most important topic.
Regards, WM

